Aha! That makes more sense now. Beautiful.YvesSPDC wrote:also the rocker part, quite long, is not part of the run ...
[Chartreuse] Another Touring ski (v2), new press, new cnc !
Moderators: Head Monkey, kelvin, bigKam, skidesmond, chrismp
-
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 8:25 pm
- Location: Kenmore, Wa USA
-
- Posts: 2338
- Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 3:26 pm
- Location: Western Mass, USA
- Contact:
I do trust solidworks and a cnc cut and drill.skidesmond wrote:I agree with the binding mount, looks like they are set way too far back. Worth a double check.

Maybe you're not familiar with lens deformation:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wide-angle_lens
-
- Posts: 2338
- Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 3:26 pm
- Location: Western Mass, USA
- Contact:
No, I'm familiar w/ lens deformation especially w/ wide angles lens and of course fish eye lens (barrel distortion). I've been an avid photographer for 30yrs, but whoop-dee-doo.
The pics that look like the binding mounts are in the proper place are the 7th and 8th pics. Probably because the binding mounts/holes are in the center of the pic, where as the pics w/ the bindings mounted tend to be toward the outer sides of the pic.
Let us know how they ski.
The pics that look like the binding mounts are in the proper place are the 7th and 8th pics. Probably because the binding mounts/holes are in the center of the pic, where as the pics w/ the bindings mounted tend to be toward the outer sides of the pic.
Let us know how they ski.
- MontuckyMadman
- Posts: 2395
- Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 9:41 pm