Core materials? early rise
Moderators: Head Monkey, kelvin, bigKam, skidesmond, chrismp
-
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 6:56 am
- Location: franconia. NH
Core materials? early rise
so im building a pair of skis that are similar demensions as the Moment Bibby pro's.. 142-116-133 and about 185cm long..
what have people used for core materials for rocker or early rise skis this size?
im looking for them to be fairly soft but able to plow through the crud still..
IDEAS WELCOME!
what have people used for core materials for rocker or early rise skis this size?
im looking for them to be fairly soft but able to plow through the crud still..
IDEAS WELCOME!
-
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 8:25 pm
- Location: Kenmore, Wa USA
twizz, do you use horizontal bamboo or vertical? Or do you rip the horiz boards turn the 90 deg and re-glue like a regular core build?
Fighting gravity on a daily basis
www.Whiteroomcustomskis.com
www.Whiteroomcustomskis.com
Re: Core materials? early rise
Exactly like any good powder ski should be designed. My design goal for my powder ski was to first off, make sure it can charge, but second, it needs to be forgiving. I've had way too many knee surgeries and I'm known to ski like an idiot. Almost everyone who flexes my skis thinks they are way too soft. They are just flexing the tips and tails though and don't realize how stiff the ski is underfoot. I think a stiff underfoot ski is the key to a ski that can charge through crud. It all comes down to the profile of your core. It doesn't really matter that much what species you use. BTW, I use poplar or ash cores with maple sidewalls.sivart7208 wrote: im looking for them to be fairly soft but able to plow through the crud still..
IDEAS WELCOME!
I have a different opinion. I personally hate, with a passion, skis that are too soft in the tips. At least for my skiing style here on the EC a ski that is too soft in the tip will deflect and hook in crust, crud and chopped up pow. I had a pair of Rossi scratch BCs like that that were miserable on anything but perfect pow or soft groomers. not a good EC ski.
I like a ski that will bust crud and chopped pow and hold well on firm snow but at the same time have enough foot print to float in pow.
I just retired a pair of first model year BROs 188 cm that I loved. They had 5-6 years in them with hundreds of days on them in VT/CO/UT. This was almost my ideal ski. I'm currently on a pair of BD Verdicts and they perform very similar to the BRO.
For my 1st build I'm trying for a stiffish ski at 185cm with a bit more underfoot and a smaller turn radius than the BRO or Verdict. Something that would float well, hold a decent edge and turn nicely in tight trees. 138/105/126 with a maple-poplar core, and 22oz triax glass
I like a ski that will bust crud and chopped pow and hold well on firm snow but at the same time have enough foot print to float in pow.
I just retired a pair of first model year BROs 188 cm that I loved. They had 5-6 years in them with hundreds of days on them in VT/CO/UT. This was almost my ideal ski. I'm currently on a pair of BD Verdicts and they perform very similar to the BRO.
For my 1st build I'm trying for a stiffish ski at 185cm with a bit more underfoot and a smaller turn radius than the BRO or Verdict. Something that would float well, hold a decent edge and turn nicely in tight trees. 138/105/126 with a maple-poplar core, and 22oz triax glass
Fighting gravity on a daily basis
www.Whiteroomcustomskis.com
www.Whiteroomcustomskis.com
I hear ya about soft tips being a love/hate thing. Some people can't stand watching the tip flap around like crazy. I had more than a few instances of the tip of my S7's actually hit me in my helmet.....and I wasn't crashing. Of course, they are a bit too soft. My 63 year old dad shreds them.Vinman wrote:I have a different opinion. I personally hate, with a passion, skis that are too soft in the tips.....I'm currently on a pair of BD Verdicts and they perform very similar to the BRO.
For my 1st build I'm trying for a stiffish ski at 185cm with a bit more underfoot and a smaller turn radius than the BRO or Verdict. Something that would float well, hold a decent edge and turn nicely in tight trees. 138/105/126 with a maple-poplar core, and 22oz triax glass
Vin--the ski you're describing doesn't really sound like a powder ski to me. More of an all-mountain charging ski. A ski 105mm underfoot in Little Cottonwood on powder day would suck. I mean, it would be like 2002 when the Gotoma's were a powder ski.
on the EC 105 mm underfoot is a powder ski. I'm going to try an S7 knockoff this summer for bigger pow days and west coast trips.
Fighting gravity on a daily basis
www.Whiteroomcustomskis.com
www.Whiteroomcustomskis.com
-
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 6:56 am
- Location: franconia. NH
-
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 8:25 pm
- Location: Kenmore, Wa USA
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 2:59 pm
Hey, Im building my first pair of skis for a school project. Im planning on making a nice wide powder ski, 183cm, 150x130x150, poplar core. When doing the core profile, what should the thickness of the core be around? I want a stiff underfoot but more softer tip/tail. Any suggestions where to start.
twizzstyle wrote:Vertically laminated floor boards.Vinman wrote:twizz, do you use horizontal bamboo or vertical? Or do you rip the horiz boards turn the 90 deg and re-glue like a regular core build?
Resurrecting this thread. You say "vertically laminated floorboards"...I can get bamboo that is vertically laminated, but it also has a thick bamboo veneer top AND bottom (I'm in Switzerland). This is the only bamboo available here. Are you using something similar?
Not All Who Wander Are Lost