Ski Press Idea any input?
Moderators: Head Monkey, kelvin, bigKam, skidesmond, chrismp
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 7:56 pm
Ski Press Idea any input?
Hey all, I'm new around here so let me start off with saying thanks for the incredible content and expertise.
Some friends and I are looking to start building skis this summer and we are in the planning process for all the equipment and jigs. I've started to draw up plans for a 2x2 steel tube press and realized I was basically building a tube. So here is the meat of my question.
Has anyone tried using 12x12 steel tube with 3/8 ths thick walls as the press frame? Seams really simple to me although maybe a little narrow but probably workable.
Any thoughts?
Cheers.
Some friends and I are looking to start building skis this summer and we are in the planning process for all the equipment and jigs. I've started to draw up plans for a 2x2 steel tube press and realized I was basically building a tube. So here is the meat of my question.
Has anyone tried using 12x12 steel tube with 3/8 ths thick walls as the press frame? Seams really simple to me although maybe a little narrow but probably workable.
Any thoughts?
Cheers.
- MontuckyMadman
- Posts: 2395
- Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 9:41 pm
I would recommend not using 2x2 steel tubing, it would require a fair amount of reinforcement. I did some stress analysis for ben_mtl on his 2x2 frame press, and he is choosing to add reinforcements to abate the deflection he's experiencing.
As for the 12x12, I would advise not making the mold wider than the 12" section, otherwise you'll run the risk of having your mold deflect in the unsupported areas, resulting in bases that aren't flat.
As for the 12x12, I would advise not making the mold wider than the 12" section, otherwise you'll run the risk of having your mold deflect in the unsupported areas, resulting in bases that aren't flat.
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 7:56 pm
Without some sort of bracing you will probably end up ballooning your tube and it will not be square anymore.
Depending on what its gonna cost for the tube it would be worth a try.
I'm a big fan of keeping it simple.
sam
Depending on what its gonna cost for the tube it would be worth a try.
I'm a big fan of keeping it simple.
sam
You don't even have a legit signature, nothing to reveal who you are and what you do...
Best of luck to you. (uneva)
Best of luck to you. (uneva)
-
- Posts: 1354
- Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 7:37 pm
-
- Posts: 1148
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 6:02 am
- Location: NJ USA
- Contact:
I just ran a quick stress analysis for a 12"x12" x 1/4" wall thickness steel tube. At 40 psi the maximum deflection was 0.103" per side (total of .206"). Also, the maximum stress is 38.62ksi...which exceeds the yield strength of most carbon steels. In short, the tube has a high chance of breaking.
I have a picture ready but I don't have the time to figure out how to post it. The story would be quite different with a thicker walled tube (1/2" or better).[/img]
I have a picture ready but I don't have the time to figure out how to post it. The story would be quite different with a thicker walled tube (1/2" or better).[/img]
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 7:56 pm
Thanks for running the numbers Jekul. Would increasing the size tube to 14" or even 16" with 1/2" walls work?Jekul wrote:I just ran a quick stress analysis for a 12"x12" x 1/4" wall thickness steel tube. At 40 psi the maximum deflection was 0.103" per side (total of .206"). Also, the maximum stress is 38.62ksi...which exceeds the yield strength of most carbon steels. In short, the tube has a high chance of breaking.
I have a picture ready but I don't have the time to figure out how to post it. The story would be quite different with a thicker walled tube (1/2" or better).[/img]
Here's the quick run numbers. A 14"x14" x 1/2" wall tube will reduce the deflection to 0.025" per side (.05" total). That number is much more manageable. Max stress is 14.39ksi, well below yield strength for most carbon steels. I worked the numbers for a 12" tube with 1/2" walls and the deflection was reduced to 0.013" per side. If you can fit everything into that small of a package then you might have a cheap press. If you wanted to reduce deflection even more it would be easy to add/weld a piece of steel above and below that would increase the cross-sectional area of the 1/2" wall thickness tube.
-
- Posts: 1354
- Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 7:37 pm
can you do the same analysis with round pipe?
I bet you'll be surprised at the numbers. I expect deflection to be very low, even with thin walled steel, and pipe is cheaper.
http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/a106- ... d_370.html
900 psi anyone? 10" schedule 40 carbon steel pipe at 200 degrees.
I bet you'll be surprised at the numbers. I expect deflection to be very low, even with thin walled steel, and pipe is cheaper.
http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/a106- ... d_370.html
900 psi anyone? 10" schedule 40 carbon steel pipe at 200 degrees.