Digi Press Printing on UHMW? Still Doesn't Work

For discussions related to ski/snowboard construction/design methods and techniques.

Moderators: Head Monkey, kelvin, bigKam, skidesmond, chrismp

Post Reply
OnDeck
Posts: 201
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 6:02 am

Digi Press Printing on UHMW? Still Doesn't Work

Post by OnDeck »

Thougt I;'d share a learning experience, that might be obvious to most of you.

A local printer turned me onto printing UHMW bases with a large format digitial press. When i explained that only epoxyable ink would work, the printer counted that that the ink layer was so thin it would make no material difference to the UHMW surface texture, which would account for at least some of the bonding properties. That made sense, so i tried two tests:

1) Digi printed, using the press, straight to UHMW
2)As above, then encapsulated with a silk screen application of clear epoxyable coating.

Results: Initially, it seemed to have worked and formed a good bond. However, neither test stood up to my extended "stress tests".

In case 1), the bond seemed to have been with the ink and did not sufficiently reach through to the UMHW. In case 2) same thing but bond was with epoxyable coating.

My final sugestion to the printer (hacking his $200,000 machine to use epoxyable inks) was not well recieved and, moreover, is bullshit and would never work.

I guess I'm kinda dumb that way. This how i learn. :oops:
User avatar
MontuckyMadman
Posts: 2395
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 9:41 pm

Post by MontuckyMadman »

You can still have him print to transfer and sublimate onto your uhmh. Did you reheat treat after printing?
sammer wrote: I'm still a tang on top guy.
OnDeck
Posts: 201
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 6:02 am

Post by OnDeck »

The transfer should work work, but it defeats the original goal...the digi press prints are unreal cheap.

Did not try the reheating (I assume you mean by flame treatment). i assumed that the ink was so thin it would be too delicate,but actually the epoxy seemed to have no affect on it at all, so maybe it would take a few seconds of flame. Guessing.

My testing is so cheap at this stage that it would be worth another look.
OnDeck
Posts: 201
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 6:02 am

Post by OnDeck »

The transfer should work work, but it defeats the original goal...the digi press prints are unreal cheap.

Did not try the reheating (I assume you mean by flame treatment). i assumed that the ink was so thin it would be too delicate,but actually the epoxy seemed to have no affect on it at all, so maybe it would take a few seconds of flame. Guessing.

My testing is so cheap at this stage that it would be worth another look.
Post Reply