So you suggest:
Flax 350
UD carbon
BCore
UD carbon
Flax 350
13 SKIS Building proces
Moderators: Head Monkey, kelvin, bigKam, skidesmond, chrismp
-
- Posts: 2338
- Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 3:26 pm
- Location: Western Mass, USA
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 175
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 11:06 pm
- Contact:
I strongly disagree with that and I know of a few cases where this lead to problems. You generally try to have a smooth transition in stiffness in order to avoid shear stress on the interface. So always core to biax to UD.
If you want to have the UD against the core I would recommend putting a very light glass or polyester fleece in-between core and UD to give it a little bit of a tougher interface.
Furthermore you would want to change the core profile as well when you switch around layers like that.
If you want to have the UD against the core I would recommend putting a very light glass or polyester fleece in-between core and UD to give it a little bit of a tougher interface.
Furthermore you would want to change the core profile as well when you switch around layers like that.
Do you think this applies to triax glass as well?SleepingAwake wrote:I strongly disagree with that and I know of a few cases where this lead to problems. You generally try to have a smooth transition in stiffness in order to avoid shear stress on the interface. So always core to biax to UD.
If you want to have the UD against the core I would recommend putting a very light glass or polyester fleece in-between core and UD to give it a little bit of a tougher interface.
Furthermore you would want to change the core profile as well when you switch around layers like that.
So don't have the 0 degree fibre against the core?
Wouldn't there always be a big differential against the UD layer?
-
- Posts: 175
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 11:06 pm
- Contact:
In theory this applies to fiberglass as well, but as your average carbon fiber is around 3 times stiffer than glass fiber the problem is less pronounced.gav wa wrote:Do you think this applies to triax glass as well?SleepingAwake wrote:I strongly disagree with that and I know of a few cases where this lead to problems. You generally try to have a smooth transition in stiffness in order to avoid shear stress on the interface. So always core to biax to UD.
If you want to have the UD against the core I would recommend putting a very light glass or polyester fleece in-between core and UD to give it a little bit of a tougher interface.
Furthermore you would want to change the core profile as well when you switch around layers like that.
So don't have the 0 degree fibre against the core?
Wouldn't there always be a big differential against the UD layer?