Prototyping aka ghetto layups
Moderators: Head Monkey, kelvin, bigKam, skidesmond, chrismp
Prototyping aka ghetto layups
I have lots of ideas on new designs but don't want to spend $$$ to test out all my new designs so I have been building prototypes with the absolute bare minimum. My first prototype consisted of a screwed up core, Ptex sidewalls, top sheets, etc that are in my shop. A whole board built of screw-ups! Cost=$0. The board tested well, my design sucked but that's the whole purpose.
My second prototype board wouldn't be that cheap because I used up all my scraps. I decided to use the bare min.: base, edges (along the effective edge), a core that ran to the edges so I wouldn't have to use any P=tex sidewalls or tip/tail fill and no top sheet. That is about as basic of a layup as you can get short of cutting out some plywood and riding it. Proto#2 is baking right now so I can pull it out and test it later today.
Anyone else doing cheap proto layups? Other ideas, suggestions?
My second prototype board wouldn't be that cheap because I used up all my scraps. I decided to use the bare min.: base, edges (along the effective edge), a core that ran to the edges so I wouldn't have to use any P=tex sidewalls or tip/tail fill and no top sheet. That is about as basic of a layup as you can get short of cutting out some plywood and riding it. Proto#2 is baking right now so I can pull it out and test it later today.
Anyone else doing cheap proto layups? Other ideas, suggestions?
-
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 8:25 pm
- Location: Kenmore, Wa USA
You know, there's really no functional reason a ski needs to be any more complicated than what you described for your proto #2, everything else is just for aesthetics (sure you can get more complicated with materials, but whatever). I know there are a few people who have tested their presses by doing half-layups, etc. I've never done full-up prototypes, but I am always doing test pieces with small scrap pieces to do rough checks of bonding, how things will look, etc.
-
- Posts: 1148
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 6:02 am
- Location: NJ USA
- Contact:
yep any time we mess up we file it for further "research"
Old cores can be reworked, old bases can be "reshaped" into smaller different shapes, our old inserts suck but work fine for a proto, shoot you can even rip edges out of an old board, sandblast then reuse them.
I also still have a bunch of old printed materials i got from a factory that went under... along with extra glass, etc, when you're strictly testing shape theory, just whatever sticks together should work enough, you just reminded me about a board i've been dreaming of prototyping.
If you're testing a new sidecut on an old board... you might even be able to just reshape an existing board, lay a template over it... saw away... then route a channel into the edge in the proper spot and hammer an edge in there if you need an edge badly
Old cores can be reworked, old bases can be "reshaped" into smaller different shapes, our old inserts suck but work fine for a proto, shoot you can even rip edges out of an old board, sandblast then reuse them.
I also still have a bunch of old printed materials i got from a factory that went under... along with extra glass, etc, when you're strictly testing shape theory, just whatever sticks together should work enough, you just reminded me about a board i've been dreaming of prototyping.
If you're testing a new sidecut on an old board... you might even be able to just reshape an existing board, lay a template over it... saw away... then route a channel into the edge in the proper spot and hammer an edge in there if you need an edge badly
Doug
-
- Posts: 192
- Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 2:51 pm
-
- Posts: 192
- Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 2:51 pm
-
- Posts: 192
- Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 2:51 pm
-
- Posts: 192
- Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 2:51 pm
Absolutely!
Notice the mismatched tip and tail with visible scotch tape holding the white ptex to the core. Also my handwritten specs in the middle for reference.

Here we have a place where the core fell off so I just layed it up anyway. That's pure epoxy

Here is the base of my core. I thought I would never use this plank so I used it as a work top. Notice the black spray paint on the core. Shes a beauty!

Notice the mismatched tip and tail with visible scotch tape holding the white ptex to the core. Also my handwritten specs in the middle for reference.

Here we have a place where the core fell off so I just layed it up anyway. That's pure epoxy

Here is the base of my core. I thought I would never use this plank so I used it as a work top. Notice the black spray paint on the core. Shes a beauty!

-
- Posts: 192
- Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 2:51 pm
The sidecut is what I was testing. The ride was perfect. I used a full rocker with a double sidecut to help with traction on icy conditions. The middle had a lot of play and stability but when pressed on ice it held tight. I have been trying to match the feel of Never Summers rocker camber base without copying it and I think I nailed it. I am going to build a few boards with the new design and have some folks test them out to make sure the boards ride as well as I think they do.
-
- Posts: 192
- Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 2:51 pm