[Chartreuse] Another Touring ski (v2), new press, new cnc !

Document your personal work here. Show photos, movies, and share your secrets.

Moderators: Head Monkey, kelvin, bigKam, skidesmond, chrismp

twizzstyle
Posts: 2204
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 8:25 pm
Location: Kenmore, Wa USA

Post by twizzstyle »

YvesSPDC wrote:also the rocker part, quite long, is not part of the run ...
Aha! That makes more sense now. Beautiful.
skidesmond
Posts: 2337
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 3:26 pm
Location: Western Mass, USA
Contact:

Post by skidesmond »

I agree with the binding mount, looks like they are set way too far back. Worth a double check.
YvesSPDC
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2011 6:30 am

Post by YvesSPDC »

skidesmond wrote:I agree with the binding mount, looks like they are set way too far back. Worth a double check.
I do trust solidworks and a cnc cut and drill. :D

Maybe you're not familiar with lens deformation:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wide-angle_lens
skidesmond
Posts: 2337
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 3:26 pm
Location: Western Mass, USA
Contact:

Post by skidesmond »

No, I'm familiar w/ lens deformation especially w/ wide angles lens and of course fish eye lens (barrel distortion). I've been an avid photographer for 30yrs, but whoop-dee-doo.

The pics that look like the binding mounts are in the proper place are the 7th and 8th pics. Probably because the binding mounts/holes are in the center of the pic, where as the pics w/ the bindings mounted tend to be toward the outer sides of the pic.

Let us know how they ski.
User avatar
MontuckyMadman
Posts: 2395
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 9:41 pm

Post by MontuckyMadman »

bbr
sammer wrote: I'm still a tang on top guy.
Post Reply